On Faith?

For those who haven’t already had the misfortune of reading On Faith, let me explain what this piece of internet blog vomit is. On Faith is the religion blog of the Washington Post. It’s panel is composed of a dozens of scholars and clergypersons from every spectrum of every religion that the media likes to pay attention to. Among them are some real gems (Rabbi Andy Bachman and Eboo Patel chief amongst them) and a bunch of predictable loons (an LDS Church official and Deepak fucking Chopra chief amongst them). Eboo and Rabbi Bachman chime in entirely too infrequently and the peanut gallery entirely too often, Deepak fucking Chopra in particular.

Lately, they’ve all been trying their darnedest to answer the question, how can one believe in God and still be prejudiced? Their inspired answer: “Well, um, faithful bigots must just be hypocrites.” Great. Thanks, guys. This answer being too easy for them to spend too much time on, they’ve moved on to normal people who still have a little bit of prejudice in them. “Also hypocrites,” they’ve decided.

What a bunch of shit. Take me, for example. Do I believe in God? Probably. Will I cross the street to avoid a really creepy looking black guy? Probably. Does this mean my involvement with religious life is all a sham? Probably not.

It’s legitimate for our beliefs to be guides for our own desired futures, rather than reflections of our current state of mind. For instance, I find it really difficult to get worked up about poor people or starving Africans or whatever. I hope to God that my involvement with the Jewish community will fix that someday. I donate a set percentage of my income to Partners in Health as an exercise in trying to make myself give two shits.

Maybe some of us also believe in God in hopes that someday we’ll behave in a way commensurate with that belief. Of course if you ask the walnuts over at On Faith, we’re all just hypocrites.

Advertisements

3 responses to “On Faith?

  1. Your frank honesty and self-reflectiveness is refreshing. I like the notion of religion/spirituality as a guidepost for the future in addition to an identity of the present.

    Nice thought.

  2. And in case anyone was wondering, this conversation is still fucking going on! This one just appeared in my reader moments ago!

  3. Anti-creepy does not necessarily equal prejudice, although your reference to color is questionable.

    And I *like* walnuts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s